What We Know
Understanding
that Joy’s knowledge of this topic is potent and that his points have merit,
we must examine his argument based on these factors. It would be
fairly hard to find flaw in Moore’s theory of exponential growth, given
that Joy himself could not find a break in its accuracy. Therefore,
for the purposes of analysis, we must assume (as Joy did) that in a free
market, technology will continue to expand and evolve exponentially.
How then, will this relate to the seemingly “Doomsday” scenario that Joy
so darkly presents? Are we to assume that the scientists working
on the GNR technologies of today have anymore ethical or logical (see Logos)
reasons to stem their work than the great minds that worked on the Manhattan
Project? If Bill Joy doesn’t think so, then its hard to imagine ourselves
forming a contrary opinion. Much of the scientific advancement today
seems to be virtually uncaring of the public’s opinion. Why then
are we to assume any change of heart will come?
There is, however, room to make comment against Bill Joy, despite his reputation and knowledge. That room is in the human ability to make predictions. Bill Joy cannot tell the future any better than the next person, and much of his fears lie in “uncharted waters”, so to speak. If Joy’s predictions of genetic engineering, nanotech, and robitics prove fruitless, then his argument loses its punch. Even if the science of today progresses into tomorrow without heed to the fate of humanity, it may never create that which will destroy itself. If it does, however, Joy’s learned warnings may come to be truer than even he expects.
|