Why the Future Doesn't Need Us
A Webbed Argument Analysis of Bill Joy's article in Wired Magazine

It's the end of the world as we know it, if we don't stop feeling so fine.  Without a conscious effort on our part, (and maybe even this won’t be enough) we will create technology that causes the extinction (or at the very least, a diminished importance) of the human race.  This is the basic premise in  "Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us," an article by Bill Joy appearing in Wired magazine.

Joy explains to us the dangers of a new breed of technologies, specifically: genetic engineering, nanotechnology and robotics.  Joy warns that they could cause “knowledge enabled mass destruction”.  They are worse than the older threats of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (NBC) because of their relative ease to create once their secrets are unlocked, unlike NBC, which are generally only creatable by someone with as vast resources as a government. 

For instance, 99% of the people on the planet would have a great deal of trouble getting their hands on weapons grade plutonium, The technology needed to make robots that can think, maybe even well enough to replace us, a newer breed of human as well as plants and animals that are already possible, or molecular electronics are closer than they may seem and when these discoveries are made, they’re very nature will make them become out of control very quickly since they are self-replicating. 

If scientists don’t police themselves, or governments don’t put restrictions on them, then these new technologies may cause the extinction of humanity. His argument was so compelling, maybe because of his overdose of ethos and disturbing ideas, that it sort of self replicated, causing many responses.

by Justin Haas and Clarice Green

Bact to top