Andy Duncan
Dr. Christine Boese
English H102-100
9/15/98
Argumentation on the Essence of Humanity
In Genesis 1:26 God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness,
and let them rule…..over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
This is the Christian belief in the creation of human beings. I believe
it is true, but I cannot direct the minds of all humanity. One of
the prevalent desires of men and women throughout history has been to find
the origins of humanity and, more so, the meaning of our existence.
This goal stimulates the need for explanations of natural events on earth,
thus, come the developments of religion, science, and technology.
Even now, as discussed in The Dark Side of the Genome, scientists attempt
to map the human genome in hope of better understanding the tendencies
of humanity. These attempts may answer the question, what defines
humanity as the species meant to rule above all other creatures of the
earth? I propose that the essence of humanity is defined by personal
experiences. The characterizations of the replicants in the movie
Blade Runner depict a desire to escape inevitable death during the search
for the attainment of humanity through experience.
The
Replicant Experience
Human experience involves the mind, body, and soul simultaneously.
If humans do not experience a situation they cannot obtain a memory of
its feel, an emotion for its effect, or a reaction due to its result.
As presented in Blade Runner in AD 2019, humanity loses all touch with
nature through his advancement in technology, especially genetic engineering.
Animals can no longer exist mutually under the oppression or humanity’s
technology, so they are manufactured. Paralleling this practice,
society designs the replicant, a cyborg meant to be, “More Human than Human.”
The replicants in Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner are designed with mind and
body, but no soul. Their memories are configured through situational
data stored in their brains. The replicants have no soul because
they are not born and allowed to develop. Replicants are programmed
and turned on as machines. Their bodies have not experienced the
memories in their minds, so they are perfect slaves. There is ideally
no way to develop emotion and, therefore, react to new situations. The
fault in this technologically idealistic creation of life is that replicants
begin to attain a soul as they experience even their assigned duties.
They find discontent on the new worlds that they build and four replicants
revolt in order to find their origins and extend the life they now experience
instead of exist within. Revolt and discontent are possible consequences
of advances in genetic engineering. Just as the hippies in the 1960’s
demonstrated, personal development through personal means is a deep desire
of the human heart. The danger of enlightenment upon this fact for
people deprived through genetic engineering could be tumultuous.
Memories might supercede experience as the root of human existence if
not for the example of the replicants. Each replicant has synthetic
memories which are implanted during their creation. If memories are
the basis for humanity then replicants are not more human than human, but
equal to humans. Instead, replicants are designeed in the interest
of slavery to show no emotion. Their memories are data instead of
past experiences. Experience creates memory of reactions to situations.
When a person subconsciously relates past and present experience the present
emotion is determined by past reaction. Scott depicts this allowance
through the identification tests given to determine the status of possible
replicants. The interviewer gives the subject hypothetical situations
and asks for the first reaction which comes to the subject’s mind.
Replicants are identified because supposedly they cannot react with emotion.
A replicant will answer with logic or not at all due to its inability to
relate through the essence of humanity, experience. With only memories
and no comparable experiences, the replicant does not know the exact response.
We as humans can determine an answer by relating the hypothetical to a
memory of a past experience and our emotional reaction. Genetic engineering
poses a threat to this natural ability. If genetic engineering develops
to the extreme, parents may be able to design their children. As
this process advances humanity could become more and more alike, endangering
the diversity of human experience, memory, and reaction.
Roy
and the Fallen Angels
Personal experiences pique the inquisitive aspects of the mind. Humans
naturally, almost subconsciously desire to be able to relate experiences
and define emotions for future reactions. The distress for replicants
is that they are not designed with emotions derived from past experiences
to relate to the present, only fabricated memories. The rebellious
escapees have no experience of early life, so they search for their origins.
They are like orphans, holding the utmost desire to prove their existence
from the beginning. The replicants attempt to define their beginnings by
collecting pictures as physical evidence of their supposed past.
Roy, the leader and most advanced of the replicant escapees, knows the
truth about his designed memories and confronts his maker, Tyrell, for
the truth and hope of extended life. Roy desires the knowledge of
his beginnings so that he may continue to experience his new found freedom
and define his soul. He alludes to his band of escapees as the fallen
angels who opposed the authority of God and were thrown down out of Heaven.
Momentarily like a repentant child, Roy returns to the “God of Biomechanics.”
He kills Tyrell because he will not let Roy into Heaven, or in other words
extend his expiration date indefinitely. Tyrell can only tell him
to “revel in his time.” Tyrell contrasts The Christian God as a god-like
figure because he is not perfect. Even though he designs the perfect
copy of a human and controls the off world colonies of near perfection,
he has imperfect eyesight (large glasses) that keeps him on earth.
Here lies another danger in genetic engineering. The “new” human
race that could result might see itself as completely superior. This
ideal could result in slavery or oppression for the “regular” humans instead
of an easy incorporation of genetically engineered people into the human
race.
As Pris attempts to win over Sebastian to the replicant cause she quotes
Descartes, “I think, therefore I am.” This seems to be a contradiction
considering that repliants are based on programmed memory. Ultimately
it seems that they should exist in the realms of their memories, but they
have new experiences inside and outside of their programmed memories every
day. This occurrence causes replicants to think and formulate reactions
for themselves based on experience. Ironically, replicants search
for a soul in experiences away from the confines of their technology while
mankind strips his own soul by allowing automation and technology to work
experiences for him.
The
Deckard Enlightenment
The Blade Runner, Deckard, is the ultimate example of a replicant’s acquisition
of a soul through experience (allowing for the assumption that he is a
replicant). Deckard personifies a dual irony as a replicant who must
come out of retirement to retire his own kind. The basis for his
developed sense of emotion must be due to experience, because simultaneously
as a replicant and a Blade Runner he is the only “person” who feels remorse
at the retirement of a replicant. Deckard stays within the confines
of his designated programming as a Blade Runner and, yet, he still develops
emotion through his given experiences. As Deckard fights to retire
Roy, the renegade replicant asks Deckard how he likes living in fear, the
true life of a slave. At the end of the fight Roy finds compassion
for Deckard and saves his life. Symbolically, Roy becomes Deckard’s
savior by showing him the experience of living, in rebellion, outside a
replicant’s programming. Roy almost transforms from the likeness
of Lucifer to Christ-likeness in this situation. The contrast between
Roy and Christ is that Roy lives outside his god’s defined rules, while
Christ lived the perfect life as God and man. Roy’s death is symbolic.
As he shuts down, the dove trapped in his fist escapes and flies toward
a moment of sunlight. This action depicts Roy’s newly born soul lifting
to the heavens. Roy never becomes human. This is not possible,
but through his experiences he develops the soul that his engineers could
not give at his creation.
The argument that Deckard is not a replicant because of his intense
emotions, extreme pain (yet durable), and ability at his profession would
attempt to annul Deckard’s acquisition of the essence of humanity through
experiences. This opposition is refutable. Deckard displays
a deepening affection for Rachel because he sees her innocence and wishes
her to experience his enlightenment (just as Roy does for Deckard).
This is the highest form of empathy that a replicant can show for another
of its species. Most of Deckard’s fingers are crushed by Roy
and he gets beaten heavily by Leon, another replicant. A human could
not take this much abuse and still perform at the level Deckard continues
to display. His ability as a Blade Runner could be progressive as
most human traits are in development. Instead, it is more feasible
that Deckard is truly a replicant. His emotional attachment to Rachel
stems from feelings for one of his own and the facts of experience.
He has been forced to retire his own kind, thus bringing about deep emotional
ties to his species. Deckard withstands severe pain by Leon and Roy
because of his replicant design and his past experiences with rebel replicants.
Deckard’s uncanny ability in his profession stem from his won experiences
in the development of his soul as a replicant. He knows his own reactions,
and, so he ultimately can relate to and predict the methods of other replicants
that he must retire.
Warnings
Blade Runner presents the most horrific consequence possible due
to desensitizing the human mind through technology. If genetic engineering
advances to the point that humanity and technology change roles within
society, mankind will cease to exist. He will become an imperfect
object among the automation of a new world. Everything and everyone
will be manufactured. Would you like plastic or paper? I personally
do not plan to take part in the further dehumanization of our great species.
In the past, present, and future the engineer has and will have the obligation
to encourage the beneficial advance of society. Diversity among the
human race is a treasure unto itself. We create machines and automation
to maximize productivity and quality. If genetic engineering advances
to the extreme, as it will be hard to stop the ball from rolling, quality
will replace appreciation for overcoming odds and working with ambition.
The goal of the human genome project is to better understand humanity,
not to mass produce the perfect race. That type of reaction would
only maximize those ideals that Hitler and the Nazis taught during World
War II. As a future engineer I understand that my obligation is to
better understand nature and to improve what is man made. Harmony
between these two ideals should be the goal of the human genome project.
Otherwise, even more than Tyrell, we as a species will lose face.